AB v Tameside & Glossop Health Authority [1996] EWCA Civ 938
Facts:
Ratio:
- C argued that the choice of the telephone as a means of alerting and reassuring people, who had received treatment from a health worker later found to be HIV+ was not correct.
Ratio:
- There was no breach of a duty to care, even though some people called had suffered distress.
Comments
Post a Comment