‘Judicial Review concerns the legality of decisions. Not their merits.’ Discuss.

  • Judicial review is concerned not with the merits of the decision, but whether the public body has acted lawfully.
  • It is not concerned with the merits of a decision (i.e. with whether or not it is a good or bad decision, or whether it is morally right or wrong), unless the decision is fundamentally irrational.
  • The courts may reach a view that a decision is so unreasonable or irrational that no reasonable authority could have reached that decision, having regard to all the facts, and therefore the Court can declare the decision unlawful.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sion v Hampstead Health Authority [1994] EWCA Civ 26

Summarise and discuss Lord Bingham’s eight ‘sub-rules’ of the Rule of Law.

R. (on the application of Abbasi) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2002] EWCA Civ 1598, (2002)