O'Connell v Jackson [1972] 1 QB 270

Facts:

  • C sought damages after an accident.
  • D was a car driver who had negligently moved forward into the path of the C, a motorcyclist, who was injured.
  • D argued that C was contributorily negligent in not wearing a crash helmet.

Issue:

  • Does a motorist’s failure to wear a helmet amount to contributory negligence in case of an accident?


Ratio:

  • Appeal allowed. C should have foreseen the possibility of being in an accident.
  • C must bear some of the responsibility for the consequences of the accident and the amount of damages is to be reduced by 15 per cent.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sion v Hampstead Health Authority [1994] EWCA Civ 26

Summarise and discuss Lord Bingham’s eight ‘sub-rules’ of the Rule of Law.

R. (on the application of Abbasi) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2002] EWCA Civ 1598, (2002)