Rothwell v Chemical and Insulating Co Ltd. [2007] UKHL 39

Facts:

  • Former asbestos workers claimed that their employers’ negligence in exposing them to asbestos had led to anxiety and depression due to fear that they could contract a serious asbestos-related disease in the future.


Issue:

  • Whether the symptomless plaques were, in and of themselves, a form of actionable damage?


Ratio:

  • HoL did not consider that the exposure could count as a ‘zone of danger’ to make the C primary victims.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Madzimbamuto v Lardner-Burke [1969] AC 645

Revill v Newbery [1996] QB 567

‘The rise of the judicial use of proportionality has given too much power to judges’. Discuss with reference to relevant cases.