Simmons v British Steel [2004] UKHL 20

Facts:

  • D was the steel company that employed C.
  • C fell and hit his head at work and suffered depression and a pre-existing skin disease flared up, not because of the original injury “but from his anger at the happening of the accident”.

Ratio:

  • C was entitled to compensation for the consequences of the accident and not just for the physical injuries.
  • C was a primary victim.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Madzimbamuto v Lardner-Burke [1969] AC 645

Revill v Newbery [1996] QB 567

‘The rise of the judicial use of proportionality has given too much power to judges’. Discuss with reference to relevant cases.