Gray v Thames Trains Ltd [2009] UKHL 33

Facts:

  • A serious injury due to the negligence of D led to C being sentenced for manslaughter.


Issue:

  • Whether the intervention of G’s criminal act in the causal relationship between T’s breaches of duty and the damage of which he complained of prevented him from recovering that loss caused by the criminal act?


Ratio:

  • The claim was based upon a criminal act for which C was responsible.
  • According to the principle of illegality, D was not liable for effects of that act.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Madzimbamuto v Lardner-Burke [1969] AC 645

Revill v Newbery [1996] QB 567

‘The rise of the judicial use of proportionality has given too much power to judges’. Discuss with reference to relevant cases.